The plaintiffs ended up entitled to some decree into the extent of their share, excluding the share of the minimal, and also the fit was decreed appropriately. The revision petition was partly approved. The petitioner’s grounds for condoning the hold off in filing the list of witnesses were not thought https://sethvzfkg.worldblogged.com/36821099/5-simple-statements-about-covenants-and-land-use-restrictions-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me-explained